vault backup: 2025-05-07 16:33:42

פילוסופיה/חדשה/ניטשה/טוב.md

@@ -233,7 +233,9 @@ literally - and this is the foreground meaning - "flatterers of Dionysius," in o
 > Adventavit asinius,
 > 
 > Pulcher et fortissimus
+> 
 >---
+> 
 > החמור הגיע, יפה ואמיץ ביותר
 > 
 > > פרק ראשון, *על דעותיהם הקדומות של הפילוסופים*
@@ -401,7 +403,7 @@ yet did a *profounder* world of insight reveal itself to daring travelers and ad
 
 הפילוסוף, סבור ניטשה, נמצא **מעבר לטוב ולרוע** - הוא לא כועס; הוא מבין מדוע העולם כפי שהוא, ולא דורש אותו אחרת. זו עמדת מיעוט, שמועילה לאנשים מסוימים - וקטלנית לאחרים.
 
-> What serves the higher type of men as nourishment or delectation must almost be poison for a very different and inferior type. \[...]  here are books that have opposite values for soul and health, depending on whether the lower soul, the lower vitality, or the higher and more vigorous ones turn to them. \[...] Where the people eat and drink, even where they venerate, it usually stinks. One should not go to church if one wants to breathe *pure* air.
+> <div style="text-align: left">What serves the higher type of men as nourishment or delectation must almost be poison for a very different and inferior type. \[...]  here are books that have opposite values for soul and health, depending on whether the lower soul, the lower vitality, or the higher and more vigorous ones turn to them. \[...] Where the people eat and drink, even where they venerate, it usually stinks. One should not go to church if one wants to breathe *pure* air</div>
 > 
 > > 31
 
@@ -411,7 +413,7 @@ yet did a *profounder* world of insight reveal itself to daring travelers and ad
 ניטשה, כאמור, כותב *presto* - מהיר וצעקני - כדי לעצבן ולסלק את ההמון. אבל המחשבה בקרב אלו שנשארים צריכה להיות *lento* - איטית. בסעיף 32, הוא מתחיל לרמוז למה הוא מתכוון. נדמה לנו במבט ראשון שניטשה קורץ במיוחד לבני הנוער, וכותב כנגד הנצרות בזעם ובהתקוממות. המציאות מחושבת יותר, וקטנונית יותר - אנו נדרשים להבחנות דקות.
 
 
-> During the longest part of human history-so-called prehistorical times-the value or disvalue of an action was derived from its consequences. The action itself was considered as little as its origin. 
+> <div style="text-align: left">During the longest part of human history-so-called prehistorical times-the value or disvalue of an action was derived from its consequences. The action itself was considered as little as its origin</div>
 
 
 
@@ -485,12 +487,12 @@ yet did a *profounder* world of insight reveal itself to daring travelers and ad
 
 בסעיף 36 ב*מעבר לטוב ולרוע*, ניטשה מציג ניסיון מחשבתי, סביב הרצון לעוצמה. אפלטון וסוקראטס מציגים את תורת האידאות כשהערת עבודה - היפותזה - וניטשה מציע הפוך: בואו נראה מה קורה אם מניחים *שאין* דבר כזה - 
 
-> Suppose nothing else were "given" as real except our world of desires and passions, and we could not get down; or up. to any other "reality" besides the reality of our drives-for thinking is merely a relation of these drives to each other
+> <div style="text-align: left">Suppose nothing else were "given" as real except our world of desires and passions, and we could not get down; or up. to any other "reality" besides the reality of our drives-for thinking is merely a relation of these drives to each other</div>
 
 
 הגישה הבלתי-אמצעית היחידה שלנו, היא למערכת הדחפים והתשוקות שלנו - אפילו המדע המודרני אינו טהור אלא מתווך. אפילו החשיבה השכלית שלנו - ה*νουσ* האפלטוני - מתווך בדחפים.
 
-> is it not permitted to make the experiment and to ask the question whether this "given" would not be sufficient for also understanding on the basis of this kind of thing the so-called mechanistic (or "material") world? I mean, not as a deception, as "mere appearance," an "idea" (in the sense of Berkeley and Schopenhauer) but as holding the same rank of reality as our affect-as a more primitive form of the world of affects in which everything still lies contained in a powerful unity before it undergoes ramifications and developments in the organic process (and, as is only fair, also becomes tenderer and weaker) -as a kind of instinctive life in which all organic functions are still synthetically intertwined along with self-regulation, assimilation, nourishment, excretion, and metabolism-as a *pre-form* of life.
+> <div style="text-align: left">is it not permitted to make the experiment and to ask the question whether this "given" would not be sufficient for also understanding on the basis of this kind of thing the so-called mechanistic (or "material") world? I mean, not as a deception, as "mere appearance," an "idea" (in the sense of Berkeley and Schopenhauer) but as holding the same rank of reality as our affect-as a more primitive form of the world of affects in which everything still lies contained in a powerful unity before it undergoes ramifications and developments in the organic process (and, as is only fair, also becomes tenderer and weaker) -as a kind of instinctive life in which all organic functions are still synthetically intertwined along with self-regulation, assimilation, nourishment, excretion, and metabolism-as a *pre-form* of life</div>
 > 
 > > 36
 
@@ -1392,7 +1394,7 @@ marmots have long persuaded ourselves in the full secrecy of a hermit's conscien
 
 > <div style="text-align: left">There are two types of genius: one which above all begets and wants to beget. and another which prefers being fertilized and giving birth. Just so. there are among peoples of genius those to whom the woman's problem of pregnancy and the secret task of forming,
 maturing, and perfecting has been allotted-the Greeks, for exampIe, were a people of this type; also the French-and others who must fertilize and become the causes of new orders of life-like the Jews, the Romans. and, asking this in all modesty, the Germans?</div>
-
+>
 <div style="text-align: left">Peoples, tormented and enchanted by unknown fevers and irresistibly pressed beyond themselves. in love and lusting after foreign races (after those who like t'being fertilized"), and at the same time domineering like all that mows itself to be fun of creative powers and hence "'by the grace of God." These two types of genius seek each other, like man and woman; but they also misunderstand each other-like man and woman.
 </div>
 >